Impact: Akin to quantifying dreams

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Who's akin to the big bad wolf?

Everyone knows that the dog is Man’s Best Friend and that stories about health are Editors’ Best Friends. So what to do when there’s a story about dogs and human health? Time to dust off the Conflicted Writer’s Best Friend, the double-barreled lead. “The first detailed genetic comparison of pure bred domestic dogs that will change the way breeds are classified and help lay the foundations for n...

متن کامل

Is friendship akin to kinship ? Joshua

Although unrelated friends are genetically equivalent to strangers, several lines of reasoning suggest that close friendship may sometimes activate processes more relevant to kinship and that this may be especially true for women. We compared responses to strangers, friends, and kin in two studies designed to address distinct domains for which kinship is known to have functional significance: i...

متن کامل

Quantifying Long-term Scientific Impact

The lack of predictability of citation-based measures frequently used to gauge impact, from impact factors to short-term citations, raises a fundamental question: Is there long-term predictability in citation patterns? Here, we derive a mechanistic model for the citation dynamics of individual papers, allowing us to collapse the citation histories of papers from different journals and disciplin...

متن کامل

Dreams

surprise to both the medical profession and the laity to hear that the subject of dreams is still imperfectly understood. Ancient philosophers endeavoured to attach ?to dreams a prophetic meaning, and even to-day, among the superstitious and ignorant, dreams form a basis for prophecy, necromancy, and the like. There 'is no question about the influence of dreams on modern life and thought. There...

متن کامل

Response to Comment on ' ' Quantifying long - term scientific impact ' '

Wang, Mei, and Hicks claim that they observed large mean prediction errors when using our model. We find that their claims are a simple consequence of overfitting, which can be avoided by standard regularization methods. Here, we show that our model provides an effective means to identify papers that may be subject to overfitting, and the model, with or without prior treatment, outperforms the ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Nature

سال: 2013

ISSN: 0028-0836,1476-4687

DOI: 10.1038/503198a